Tuesday, April 24, 2012

II. 04/24: Preface to the Frame of Government of Pennsylvania, William Penn, 1682

1. What is the author arguing?

William Penn is arguing that the state of Pennsylvania needs a government that is just and incorruptible. He argues that the God like right of government beyond exception is to serve two ends, to frighten evil doers and to protect and care for those that do well thus giving government a life beyond corruption that that will withstand the wear and pressures in the world as good as the character of men shall be. In other words, governments are only as good as the character of those who are responsible for governing. So as governments are influenced by the powers entrusted to them, they can also be ruined or corrupted by the very power they are given.

2. How does the author appeal to logos (logic), pathos (emotional quality), and ethos (the writer’s perceived character) with their argument?

William Penn appeals to logos in defining that governments are needed for the protection of the common man’s rights and to set rules upon the common man so that no one can easily do as they please. He also states that we need a democracy and not an oligarchy, monarchy, or aristocracy because these types of tyrannical control lead to the corruption and later destruction of the country as seen in the Jewish and Roman states. Penn’s appeal to pathos is compassionate and has intense fervor for the well being of Pennsylvania’s common man. This is proven in his statements, “…governments are made and moved by men, so by them they are ruined too. Wherefore governments rather depend upon men, than men upon governments. Let men be good, and the government cannot be bad; if it be ill, they will cure it. But, if men be bad, let the government be never so good, they will endeavor to warp and spoil it to their turn.” These statements show that William Penn believes that every man should have a voice in the government’s creation and decisions and should never fear any repercussion for refusing and resisting the will of a corrupted and deceitful government. By the statements above we can allude to William Penn’s appeal to ethos as being that of an intelligent and just man that believes that the government should be for the good of the people and that our government is only as good as the people who are responsible for governing.

3. What is the historical significance/relevance of this document?

This document was the introduction to Pennsylvania’s first frame of constitutional government and formed the first steps of democracy in America. On the fifteenth anniversary of this preface, the Liberty Bell was created. This document later became one of the backbones for the United States Constitution.

4. Do you find the author’s argument convincing? Why or why not?

I find William Penn’s argument convincing because his statements on how governments that are formed by corruption or corrupt people are doomed to fail and become detrimental to the very people they serve. I believe Penn’s philosophy bears a ghastly comparison to America’s current affairs because our previous governmental leadership was corrupted into leading us into a war based on deception that has lead to our country’s current economic downturn and political crisis. We can also see how governmental corruption unfolds throughout the world such as the actions happening in Syria and Africa where their governments are destroying their countries and killing their own people whom they are responsible for protecting. An old saying says that “those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it.”

3 comments:

  1. I very much agree with your statement that Penn's document formed a pillar in the foundation of our democracy. He was definitely arguing that men bear the responsibility for the direction government takes. I also think Penn was arguing that the main purpose for having a government and laws was "the care and regulation of many other affairs" rather than serving primarily to punish those who break the law. Penn equates government with religion, signifying the widespread Christianity of our founding fathers. I think he was arguing that men are essentially good people, but they are subject to temptations and capable of wrongdoing, thus demonstrating the necessity of government. However, I think he was arguing for a less invasive government, one more concerned with "soft and daily necessary affairs," rather than "big-brother" type invasions into the personal lives of citizens. I also very much agree with your comments about how Penn's vision of government and our current state of affairs are very far apart. I believe we live in a situation far removed from many of our founding fathers' ideals. Nice job on this analysis.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As one of the first constitutions in the New World, this document laid the framework for the creation of American democracy. I agree with you that Penn aimed to create a system that will eliminate corruption in the government. This corruption can be caused by the nature of human beings, external forces, or simply having too much power (tyranny). One of his solutions was to balance the powers in the government, which was also used in the U.S. Constitution. I wonder how our nation would function if Penn's ideas weren't included within the U.S. Constitution! The laws that Penn helped constitute seemed like an organized law! For example, "XXII. That there shall be a register for births, marriages, burials, wills, and letters of administration, distinct from the other registry." so that they can keep a record of the residents that live there. But as for the burials, what about the men who disrupt their law?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with you completely, William Penn was very much interested in structuring the Government of Pennsylvania in favor of the common man. To protect and serve the innocent and to prosecute the disobedient and ungodly. I thought it was great that you pointed out that governments can only be as good as the character of those who are responsible for governing. I thought that directly related to the text because any government can be rough around the edges. The text states "had Adam never fell, and will continue among men" which was a great example of temptation, supports your thought of the potential for a government to be corrupt towards the very people they serve. Great job on your text analysis Brandon, keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete